As reported in earlier postings, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced that it will begin requiring all proposal submissions to include a data management plan in the form of a two-page supplementary document. The new requirement is expected to take effect in October 2010.
In the wake of this announcement (and the absence of any follow-up guidelines from NSF), university research administrators around the country are taking action. At a minimum, they are adding the NSF announcement (Press release 10-077) to their websites, newsletters or blogs. Most blurbs conclude with a pledge to keep the research communities informed of instructions from NSF as soon as they are made available.
In a few noteworthy cases, research offices are more proactively preparing for the new NSF requirement.
Woods Hole’s Director of Research is “planning activities through the summer of 2010 to look at shifting data management requirements from funders ” and assess “the larger data needs of WHOI scientists.” They are organizing meetings with PI’s to discussing the changing NSF policy and identify PI needs. Ultimately they aim to create a set of template data management plans that PI’s can adapt and include in their future NSF proposals. The summer plan is described on their website.
The Office of Research Integrity at University of Alaska, Fairbanks has produced a helpful Data Management page on their website that details not only principles and guidelines for data management but also University policy regarding the oversight of data collection, the transfer of data to other institutions and University requirements for the retention of data. These “local” considerations must be woven into any data management plan prepared for an outside funding agency, such as NSF.
And in an interesting example from the University of Utah, the Associate VP for Research has chosen to link the announcement about the new NSF requirement to a pitch for the university’s Institutional Repository, ‘Uspace’. Her letter to Faculty and Deans aims to raise awareness of the IR as
“a possible repository for your data at the university. Uspace (Uspace.utah.edu) is an online repository for data/software/theses/dissertations/publications/reports/etc. It is made possible by the Institutional Repository Initiative, which is a collaborative project between the libraries at the University of Utah and the University community. Their goal is to collect and archive the intellectual capital of the institution and make these scholarly materials freely available on the Internet.”/strong>
.
The letter concludes with the contact information at the Library which will provide assistance and further information.
Each of these examples demonstrates ways in which Universities can take steps now to prepare for the new NSF requirement. We’d love to hear from other Universities about your plans to prepare for October!