The Scholar’s Space

Communicating research findings in a networked world
Georgia Harper

Why don’t you come over and see me sometime

Posted by Georgia Harper on Oct 28th, 2007
2007
Oct 28

I am conducting a research project that I’d like to invite anyone who is interested to take part in. It’s taking place here at TDL blogs and includes three aspects:

  1. I am trying out a theme for WordPress (the blog software we’re using here at TDL) called CommentPress that allows for comments at the level of the paragraph, and might be useful to academics for refining drafts of papers, and so might be a service we could offer in the TDL;
  2.  I’m conducting research on blogs as scholarship, and what I learn about blogging here in Scholar’s Space (and elsewhere), and now in Mass Digitization, the experiment in CommentPress, form the basis for a later survey I’ll do of legal bloggers;
  3. I’m drafting a paper on the effects of mass digitization projects on copyright law and policy as the “draft” that’s up for review in CommentPress. I add another section to the draft each week. I’m working on section 4 for the coming week.

So… if you are interested in seeing what CommentPress is all about, or interested in how blogs are finding their place in academic scholarship, or in the effects of mass digitization projects on copyright law and policy, why don’t you come on over and see me sometime — right next door at Mass digitization.

User Photo

Keep the Champagne Corked.

Posted by Alex Bienkowski on Oct 24th, 2007
2007
Oct 24

OA advocates shouldn’t celebrate too hard and too early.  The legislative reconcilliation process involves a lot of horse trading,and since there is more in the act than the OA mandate,  this is the place where perfectly innocent provisions that seemed destined for a long and happy life can get a stiletto in the ribs on a dark staircase. Or at least they can be changed very considerably and be sent to the floor for a vote in forms that disappoint their supporters.  Dark Forces are free to cast their malign spells: Mwa ha ha ha ha!  “Opera ain’t over” etc. I have been impressed by the high degree of interest both houses have shown in this, since 2003. I think Congressional staffers got hold of  it and are telling their leaders that they have to be right on this one: research=health=cures=votes. If it doesn’t go this time, it will the next or the time after that.

User Photo

Max Planck Society tells Springer to take a hike

Posted by Roxanne Bogucka on Oct 24th, 2007
2007
Oct 24

Last week the Max Planck Society cancelled online access to Springer journals, after negotiations on the pricing fell through. The Society, a signatory of the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, has deep pockets, but apparently has had it, and was sufficiently cross to issue a public announcement to that effect.

The money quote: “If publishers have the market power to effectively implement such prices and if legislators are unwilling to subject such inappropriate behavior to legal controls, the only way left open to science will be to take matters into their own hands.”

Lexie Thompson-Young

Mandate for Public Access to NIH-Funded Research Poised to Become Law

Posted by Lexie Thompson-Young on Oct 24th, 2007
2007
Oct 24

Please see the ATA press release below about “Mandate for Public Access to NIH-Funded Research Poised to Become Law.” 

This is a significant development for not only the public who will have access to taxpayer-funded research, but also for the higher education administrators and library staff who will be helping NIH-funded researchers deposit copies of their manuscripts into the NIH’s online database, PubMedCentral. 

We’ve blogged about PubMedCentral and services for NIH-funded researchers before, PubMed Central as an Open Access Resource, and New Services for Scholars’ Success, and I certainly look forward to seeing if the NIH Public Access Policy becomes mandatory. 

To become mandatory, the bill the House passed and the bill the Senate passed must be reconciled before being delivered to the President for signature.   

 *************************************************************

Full U.S. Senate Approves Bill Containing Support for Access To Taxpayer-Funded Research Washington, D.C. October 24, 2007 - The U.S. Senate last night approved the FY2008 Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Bill (S.1710), including a provision that directs the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to strengthen its Public Access Policy by requiring rather than requesting participation by researchers. The bill will now be reconciled with the House Appropriations Bill, which contains a similar provision, in another step toward support for public access to publicly funded research becoming United States law.“Last night’s Senate action is a milestone victory for public access to taxpayer-funded research,” said Heather Joseph, Executive Director of SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, a founding member of the ATA). “This policy sets the stage for researchers, patients, and the general public to benefit in new and important ways from our collective investment in the critical biomedical research conducted by the NIH.”Under a mandatory policy, NIH-funded researchers will be required to deposit copies of eligible manuscripts into the National Library of Medicine’s online database, PubMed Central. Articles will be made publicly available no later than 12 months after publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

The current NIH Public Access Policy, first implemented in 2005, is a voluntary measure and has resulted in a de deposit rate of less than 5% by individual investigators. The advance to a mandatory policy is the result of more than two years of monitoring and evaluation by the NIH, Congress, and the community.

“We thank our Senators for taking action on this important issue,” said Pat Furlong, Founding President and CEO of Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy.

“This level of access to NIH-funded research will impact the disease process in novel ways, improving the ability of scientists to advance therapies and enabling patients and their advocates to participate more effectively. The advance is timely, much-needed, and we anticipate an indication of increasingly enhanced access in future.”

“American businesses will benefit tremendously from improved access to NIH research,” said William Kovacs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce vice president for environment, technology and regulatory affairs. “The Chamber encourages the free and timely dissemination of scientific knowledge produced by the NIH as it will improve both the public and industry’s ability to become better informed on developments that impact them and on opportunities for innovation.” The Chamber is the world’s largest business federation, representing more than three million businesses of every size, sector, and region.

“We welcome the NIH policy being made mandatory and thank Congress for backing this important step,” said Gary Ward, Treasurer of the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). “Free and timely public access to scientific literature is necessary to ensure that new discoveries are made as quickly as feasible. It’s the right thing to do, given that taxpayers fund this research.” The ASCB represents 11,000 members and publishes the highly ranked peer-reviewed journal, Molecular Biology of the Cell.

Joseph added, “On behalf of the taxpayers, patients, researchers, students, libraries, universities, and businesses that pressed this bill forward with their support over the past two years, the ATA thanks Congress for throwing its weight behind the success of taxpayer access to taxpayer-funded research.”

Negotiators from the House and Senate are expected to meet to reconcile their respective bills this fall. The final, consolidated bill will have to pass the House and the Senate before being delivered to the President at the end of the year.

###

The Alliance for Taxpayer Access is a coalition of patient, academic, research, and publishing organizations that supports open public access to the results of federally funded research. The Alliance was formed in 2004 to urge that peer-reviewed articles stemming from taxpayer-funded research become fully accessible and available online at no extra cost to the American public. Details on the ATA may be found at http://www.taxpayeraccess.org.

Georgia Harper
2007
Oct 23

I saw this post a few days ago, but just read it closely today and noticed that two of the three network directors within the new Humanities Research Network are University of Texas at Austin faculty: ResourceShelf » SSRN Announces New Humanities Research Network (HRN). I find the SSRN extremely useful and I’m sure the HRN will be too. Congratulations to our UT Austin colleagues who will be at the helm!

Georgia Harper
2007
Oct 23

I am beginning a research project on the effect of blogs on scholarly communication, so I’m reading everything I can get my hands on that even remotely touches on the subject. I would gratefully welcome any suggestions!

Among my finds today is this post by the CogSci Librarian about a panel discussion on science blogging: CogSci Librarian: Science Blogging: Translating Scientese into English. The post contains links to ScienceBlogs (over 60, covering 8 subject areas, including the humanities and social sciences), a presentation by Jean-Claude Bradley on Open Source/Open Notebook Science (doing science with blogs and wikis), and the Scientific Activist blog (trying to affect policy), among many others. This was a gold mine of information for me. Up until this find, I was beginning to think that most academic blogging was going on in law. Well, actually, most writing *about* scholarly blogging seems to be about legal blogging, but I can see that maybe I just haven’t dug deep enough yet.

My research project involves my blogging a legal research paper on the subject of the effect of mass digitization projects on copyright law and policy. The blog is just next door, on the TDL’s blog site. Please come and visit. I post one section of the paper each week and hope to get comments and suggestions in the CommentPress blog theme for WordPress. I’ll write up the results of this experience and use what I learn as a basis for formulating a survey to go out to blogging scholars. So far I’ve learned that it’s very difficult to get people to comment! Considering how many blogs I read and how few I comment on, this should come as no surprise to me…

User Photo

IFB Looks at the Really Modern Library.

Posted by Alex Bienkowski on Oct 19th, 2007
2007
Oct 19

The Institute for the Future of the Book is a kind of think-tank devoted to pondering pretty much what the name says.  One of the  projects underway there is The Really Modern Library.  Here we must pause for a historical digression to help the younger folk. The original Modern Library was a creation of Bennett Cert, head of Random House publishers, back in the Forties of the last century or so. His idea was to make important works of literature available in good editions, cheaply. To my mind, ML was one of the great triumphs of book technology. The volumes sold for a buck, were well-designed, nicely printed and so well-bound as to be almost indestructable. ML editions still turn up in rummage sales or garage clean-outs, and they’re often in good shape. They were also small, fitting nicely into the hand, pocket or purse.  A serious reader without a lot of cash could easily build a respectable library from the ML by a little scrimping. The British tried the same thing with Everyman’s Library, which, as I recall had more titles, but they were not as slickly produced as the Yank series. Both series had high intentions: bringing good books to more people, at a fair price.  Well the IFB wants to move the concept forward, and the proposal for the RML is to get people thinking about what’s involved in moving the mass of analog material onto digital format.  This obviously implies mass digitization in an operational sense, but the RML also wants to go beyond questions of work flow or machine selection to broader, “softer” matters relating to the reader’s experience, text “presentation”, the ability to supplement our reading by the use of ancillary resources and so on. It’s a bit of a “blue sky” piece, but somebody has to think about these things, even if we don’t get it right the first couple of times.
IFB

Georgia Harper

Alma Swan’s Open Access Calendar for 2008

Posted by Georgia Harper on Oct 16th, 2007
2007
Oct 16

Thanks to Scholarly Communication at UNC for the reference to Alma Swan’s site, Key Perspectives. Consultants to the scholarly information industry. Publishing consultants. Open access., where she is sharing her Open Access Calendar for 2008. You can download the pdfs or ask her for a printed copy. It’s filled with interesting information about the growth of open access and each page has a beautiful image or text (or text image) that inspires. Very well done and I can’t wait to print mine out.

Georgia Harper

Latest Journal of Electronic Publishing is out and looks great

Posted by Georgia Harper on Oct 14th, 2007
2007
Oct 14

The latest The Journal of Electronic Publishing is out and loaded with interesting items (summary from the ResourceShelf):

+ Laura Brown, Rebecca Griffiths, Matthew Rascoff
University Publishing in a Digital Age

+ Lynn Silipigni Connaway + Heather L. Wicht
What Happened to the E-book Revolution?

+ John Cords
Reviews: The Google Story and Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge

+ John F. Dawson
Electronic Publishing as a Course Context for a Capstone Project on Protein Design

+ Kathleen Fitzpatrick
CommentPress: New (Social) Structures for New (Networked) Texts

+ Matthew Mayernik
The Prevalence of Additional Electronic Features in Pure E-Journals

+ Rick Musser + Staci Martin-Wolfe
Blogs as a Student Content Management System

+ Paul Peters
Redefining Scholarly Publishing as a Service Industry

+ Mark Sandler, Kim Armstrong, Bob Nardini
Market Formation for E-Books: Diffusion, Confusion or Delusion?

User Photo

Virtual Research Environment

Posted by Cathy Hartman on Oct 13th, 2007
2007
Oct 13

I spent most of this week attending the Access Conference in Victoria, British Columbia. Mark Leggott of the University of Prince Edward Island spoke at the conference about a virtual research environment (VRE) that they are creating to support university research and learning. The VRE offers collaborative work space for research projects and processes for submission of documents, data sets, or other outputs of the project that are then stored in an archive. The framework is Web 2.0/3.0 and uses Fedora/Drupal/Moodle systems as the foundation, all open source systems. This is exciting work that uses an innovative architecture to support multiple functions of the scholarly communications process.

Next »